Re: vrrpv3 with global IPv6
Seiichi Kawamura <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:28:34 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vrrp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi John John Cruz (johcruz) wrote: > Hi, > > To the best of my knowledge, the one of the earlier drafts > mentioned link-local addresses only. This might be the reason > why certain implementations support link-local addresses > only. Thanks for this. That would be reason enough to explain for some of the implementations that have been around for a while. I've heard of recent implementations that do not support global though... > > The current standards supports virtual addresses that have > global scope. Can you point to a specific phrase in the RFC where it says so? I could not find any mention of the word global in the RFC nor any RFC2119 words relating to scopes of addresses. Regards, Seiichi > > Regards > John > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of >> Seiichi Kawamura >> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:42 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: [VRRP] vrrpv3 with global IPv6 >> > I've been discussing this with a few people this week > and thought that it was worth asking this list. > > rfc5798 says in section 5.2.9 > > For IPv6, the first address must be the IPv6 link-local address > associated with the virtual router. > > It implies that a global address can be associated > with the virtual router, but some routers > implement link-local capability only becuase only the > link-local address is mentioned here. > > The problem is, operators need global scope addresses with > virtual routers and we have to ask each vendor to > implement it if they have not already done so. The main > reason we need this is becausewe need to monitor the address > from a remote network as we do with IPv4. > > I just joined this list, but can someone > tell me what was the thinking was behind not > mentioning global addresses in this RFC? > > Thank you > > Regards, > Seiichi > _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkxTUhEACgkQcrhTYfxyMkKL1wCgjlVy8g4RhiMF1Upq++3zs3Vi nCkAn34uQUGI4XJtaFXuh+i0C+k2gsJR =OL8C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp