Re: overwrite and depth-0 locks
Julian Reschke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.webdav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Geoffrey M Clemm schrieb: > > All use cases below other than #1 require the locktoken. > > Cheers, > Geoff Correct. In all cases except #1, the state of the collection is changed, by replacing a binding (aka "path segment mapping" in RFC2518bis). Tim: speaking of which, was there anything in draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.html>) or draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18.html>) suggesting something else? Best regards, Julian