Re: RFC 3744: principal-collection-set

I think that's a very important feature.  There's no intrinsic need  
for SEARCH to rely on properties, and it should be valuable for a  
number of non-WebDAV use cases.

Duplicating the server's feature advertisement in both OPTIONS and  
properties should not be much of a hardship for a server and makes it  
easier for a variety of clients to learn what they need to know.

Lisa

On Apr 27, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> Thinking of it, another reason for the "legacy" design may be that  
> DASL intended to make it possible that a search arbiter resource  
> (something responding to SEARCH) doesn't need to be a WebDAV  
> resource (responding to PROPFIND). I'm not entirely sure that we  
> should eliminate that feature...