Re: RFC 3744: principal-collection-set

Yes, and I think that's OK for non-WebDAV clients.  A client has to  
get its search results in some machine-readable form.  (If the client  
were looking for human readable results there'd likely be a WebUI and  
no standards involved).  So XML is adequate for that purpose, and why  
not "DAV:" and "multistatus".  At least it's a schema we have some  
experience with.

Lisa


On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> I think that's a very important feature.  There's no intrinsic  
>> need for SEARCH to rely on properties, and it should be valuable  
>> for a number of non-WebDAV use cases.
>
> True, but note that the DAV:multistatus format is mandated anyway  
> (and I think MS Exchange is doing that for it's "sql" grammar).
>
>> ...
>
> Best regards, Julian