Re: [Ietf-carddav] Comments on draft-daboo-carddav-02

Am 16.07.2007 um 16:57 schrieb Julian Reschke:
>> However, I do agree that this is not an ideal state of affairs. If  
>> there is consensus in the WebDAV community to do so, I agree that  
>> we should write up a formal extension to MKCOL that would cover  
>> all the other MKxxx's behaviors. However, I do not believe that  
>> belongs in CardDAV, it should be a separate extension that CardDAV  
>> can itself leverage. I would be happy to put a spec together on  
>> that (extracting the behaviors from the existing specs).
>
> I think that would be great. I think all we need is a request body  
> (XML + mime type) that will allow to specify a set of WebDAV  
> properties, including the resource type.

Maybe send a POST + request body to the parent collection?

POST seems to have been avoided by WebDAV to not interfere with  
webapps using the same URIs. But those days are over.

//Stefan