Re: Blog comments on <http://tinpixel.com/node/28> -- "Why I don't like WebDAV, part 1"
Joe Orton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.webdav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:05:55PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > WebDAV is as fast as FTP, usually being only limited by bandwidth and > latency of the link. And of course there are lots of other reasons to > like WebDAV, such as that it *is* HTTP -- no new URI needed to edit > something that already is on the web. DAV is typically (really, always) *faster* than FTP, since it doesn't require the set up of a new TCP connection for each data transfer. Understanding the impact of separate DTP/control sockets answers the "Why not just improve FTP?" question for most people, I'd suspect. joe