Re: Thoughts on relation to WebDAV

On Thursday 22 May 2008 15:55:36 Petr Tomasek wrote:
> > I think CardDAV should require WebDAV level 3 support, as defined by RFC
> > 4918. It seems there was some confusion about what level 3 actually is:
>
> I think this is a big error, requiring all that stuff. Consider if one
> would want to implement read-only CardDAV implementation.
> Why should one worry about locking, MKCOL and the other stuff?

I think you're confused (as I was) about what class 3 implies. It does *not* 
imply locking. This is the very confusion that Julian is talking about.

I wonder where you got the strange idea that class 3 would include MKCOL. :)