Re: Thoughts on relation to WebDAV

Simon Perreault <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.webdav
Organization Viagénie
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Friday 23 May 2008 09:36:46 Henrik Holst wrote:
> There is no MUST in RFC4918 for the MKCOL Method so class 1 does not
> include MKCOL as far as I can see.

Is it intentional? I mean, RFC2518 says "All DAV compliant resources MUST 
support the MKCOL method." And advertising class 3 would not imply support 
for MKCOL, if I read the definition of class 3 correctly.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.