Re: I-D Action:draft-reschke-webdav-post-02.txt

Hi Julian,

--On December 6, 2008 10:27:18 PM +0100 Julian Reschke 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> - is there sufficient community support for this justifying the put the
>> element names into the DAV: namespace?
>
> I heard two "yes" votes (one on which from one of our Area Directory), an
> no "no".
>
> So the next draft will use the DAV: namespace.

Additional +1.

>> and
>>
>> - should I keep the sections that talk about the HTTP Link header (which
>> is currently being proposed in an I-D which may or may not be ready
>> before this proposal is ready)
>
> For now I'll leave this out; instead, when the Link header spec is done
> I'll propose a document specifying how to map link-typed DAV properties
> to Link headers in general (see proposal in
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2008OctDec/0026.html>).

That seems reasonable.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo