Re: [VCARDDAV] IANA Considerations, was: vcarddav WGLC on draft-ietf-vcarddav-{carddav, mkcol}

Hi Julian,

--On March 12, 2009 3:46:07 PM +0100 Julian Reschke <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> A few comments with respect to the IANA Considerations
> (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-06#section-14>):
>
> 1) The references style, as in
>
>    "... defined by RFC4918 [RFC4918] for ..."
>
> looks a bit weird (artifact from a time when this document used numeric
> references?)

Agreed - fixed.

> 2) The statement:
>
>     "All other IANA considerations mentioned in RFC4918 [RFC4918] also
>     apply to this document."
>
> is very misleading; RFC 4918's IANA Considerations talk about URI scheme
> registrations, HTTP header registrations, and HTTP status code
> registrations. None of this is relevant to CardDAV, so just drop the
> sentence.

Yup that was a little odd. I have changed the section to simply:

    This document uses a URN to describe a new XML namespace conforming to
    the registry mechanism described in [RFC3688].

> 3) I also found the statement below confusing:
>
>    "XML: None.  Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification."
>
> Proposal: just state:
>
>    "XML: None - not applicable for namespace registrations".

Changed.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo