Re: [VCARDDAV] Pseudo-properties in reports, was: vcarddav WGLC on draft-ietf-vcarddav-{carddav, mkcol}
Cyrus Daboo <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:42:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.webdav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Arnaud, --On March 17, 2009 4:37:54 PM +0100 Arnaud Quillaud <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, it *is* confusing for people who haven't implemented CalDAV, but >> other WebDAV extensions, such as SEARCH (which successfully avoided >> overloading properties). > My feeling is that there are many more clients/servers doing CalDAV + > CardDAV than clients/server doing CardDAV + SEARCH but of course I have > no numbers to back that statement. I will have this as an open issue for discussion at the meeting next week. My preference is to leave it as-is. Having done implementations of this (probably over half-a-dozen different varieties of clients/servers CardDAV and CalDAV) I really see no problem with the pseudo property - including starting with a base WebDAV implementation. -- Cyrus Daboo