Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03
Julian Reschke <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.webdav,gmane.network.syndication.atom.syntax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jan Algermissen wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> >> "When a resource is put under version control, it becomes a "versioned >> resource". Many servers protect versioned resources from modifications >> by considering them "checked in", and by requiring a "checkout" >> operation before modification, and a "checkin" operation to go back to >> the "checked-in" state. Other servers allow modification, in which >> case the checkout/checkin operation may happen implicitly." >> > >> When a resource is put under version control, it becomes a "versioned >> resource". Many servers protect versioned resources from modifications >> by considering them "checked in", and by requiring a "checkout" >> operation before modification, and a "checkin" operation to go back to >> the "checked-in" state. Other servers allow modification and perfrom >> versioning without requiring an explicit checkout operation. > > > I feel there should be the notion of 'modification of checked-out > working copy' in there but I don't mean to say that your above wording > isn't suitable also. > ... For now I have applied my change proposal in <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-latest.html#rfc.section.2>, but that doesn't mean we can't spend some more time with wordsmithing :-) BR, Julian