Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03

Jan Algermissen wrote:
> Julian,
> 
> what is your opinion regarding the introduction of a link relation that 
> is the opposite of working-copy in order to being able to find the 
> versioned resource that the working copy I have is a working copy of?
> 
> I am undecided regarding the necessity, but without a working-copy-of 
> relation it seems the client would need to maintain that information 
> (the relationship or the fact that a given resource is a working copy) 
> across requests.
> 
> I do not think this is really I-D publication relevant right now, please 
> understand it only as a side comment.
> ...

I have no problems adding this; the reason it hasn't been proposed was 
that apparently CMIS didn't have a use case for it.

Al, any opinion on this from a CMIS point of view?

Best regards, Julian