Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt
Julian Reschke <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:13:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.webdav,gmane.network.syndication.atom.syntax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > Putting something under version control really doesn't mean anything > beyond having multiple versions of the resource. > There are of course a variety of other features supported by many > versioning servers, but having a version history is the lowest common > denominator. > > So yes, this draft would apply to the case you describe, as long as > multiple separately addressable versions of the resource are provided. > > Cheers, > Geoff > ... Agreed. At least for the link relations that support the navigation between versions it really doesn't matter whether internally a version control system was used. (For the working-copy related relations things may be different because they somehow imply authorability of a resource). Best regards, Julian