Re: LOCKing an unmapped URL

Section 9.10.6 of RFC 4918 doesn't mandate those headers to be included, but=
 I don't think it is forbidden to include them. Even when considering the PU=
T method as an anology, those headers are not obligatory.

Werner.

--
http://www.pincette.biz/
Handling your documents with care, wherever you are.

Op 03 Jan 2013 om 21:59 heeft Ken Murchison <[email protected]> het volge=
nde geschreven:

> If a write lock is successfully created on an unmapped URL, should an ETag=
 (with associated Location header) be returned for the empty resource in the=
 201 response?
>=20
> --=20
> Kenneth Murchison
> Principal Systems Software Engineer
> Carnegie Mellon University
>=20