Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-05.txt

On 09/19/2013 10:38 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> --On September 19, 2013 at 10:05:04 AM -0400 Ken Murchison 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>> If you feel that this is a show-stopper, I can certainly remove this
>>>> text.
>>>
>>> I'd get rid of it.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>
> Well I do think it is worth mentioning that the Brief header exists 
> and this new draft is defining a standards-based alternative to that - 
> emphasizing that servers/clients that currently support Brief can also 
> implement Prefer without any problems. The only thing to state is that 
> if a server receives both Brief and Prefer it should prefer Prefer!
>

Do you have any suggested text to replace/augment what I have in 
Appendix A?  I think Julian wants me to remove the suggestion that 
Prefer-based implementations also implement Brief.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University