Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-05.txt

On 2013-09-19 16:43, Ken Murchison wrote:
> On 09/19/2013 10:38 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>>
>> --On September 19, 2013 at 10:05:04 AM -0400 Ken Murchison
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>> If you feel that this is a show-stopper, I can certainly remove this
>>>>> text.
>>>>
>>>> I'd get rid of it.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>
>> Well I do think it is worth mentioning that the Brief header exists
>> and this new draft is defining a standards-based alternative to that -
>> emphasizing that servers/clients that currently support Brief can also
>> implement Prefer without any problems. The only thing to state is that
>> if a server receives both Brief and Prefer it should prefer Prefer!

Prefer: prefer

/me ducks

> Do you have any suggested text to replace/augment what I have in
> Appendix A?  I think Julian wants me to remove the suggestion that
> Prefer-based implementations also implement Brief.

Stating where it came from is good (plus having the references).

I just wouldn't recommend to implement it; if you do so, people *will* 
ask what the point of the new spec is.

Best regards, Julian