Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-05.txt

Hi Ken,

--On September 19, 2013 at 11:53:35 AM -0400 Ken Murchison 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "Client and server implementations that already support the Brief field
> header should be able to add support for the return=minimal preference
> with little effort."  (I had "minimal effort" but it didn't read right)

Change:

"field header" to "header field"
"should be able to" to "can".

> "If a server receives both Brief and Prefer header fields in a request,
> it MUST ignore the Brief header field and only apply the Prefer header
> field preferences, if it so chooses."

The MUST and "if it so choose" are conflicting. How about:

    If a server supporting the Prefer header receives both Brief and Prefer
    header fields in a request, it MUST ignore the Brief header field and
    only use the Prefer header field preferences.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo