Re: Call to close group (fwd)

So far as I'm aware, we only had one draft that was still in progress (the 
IDD work expired long ago).

The authors/editors on the RUP document have been contacted by Patrik and 
it's my understanding there is a desire for that work to be finished (which 
I think answers Scott's question).  I'm currently setting up a new mailing 
list where that work can be discussed  and will send invites for 
subscriptions to those who are still on this list.

--On Monday, June 3, 2002 10:06 -0700 Phil Rzewski <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Well, strictly speaking, "preserving the work ... for institutional
> memory" is a goal of every working group, right? So what's missing here
> is exactly what every working group needs: A reasonably sized & active
> community of interest, rough consensus, and person-hours of work to
> document and iron out details to create a final written representation.
> What WEBI has at this moment are a couple of drafts-in-progress, but
> apparently not enough of the previously stated resources to make them
> RFC-able.
>
> --
> Phil
>
>
> At 07:00 AM 6/2/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2002 03:38:51PM -0500, Ian Cooper wrote:
>>> I've seen quite a few unsubscriptions to the list since this message
>>> went  out, but no comments.  If you have something to say on this
>>> matter, this
> is
>>> your opportunity to do so.
>>
>> I have barely participated at all so I have no right to an opinion ...
>> but what steps would be taken to preserve the work the group has done so
>> far, for institutional memory?
>>
> --
> Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation
> 650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)