RE: WIERD

Well, that's kinda why I asked.  If you were willing to help chair, we
would schedule it not to conflict with whatever you want to avoid.  Or at
least try to.  I.e. we have the opportunity to affect the agenda now.

:-)
evilly yours,
A.

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 [email protected] wrote:

> April,
> 
> That's what I get for sticking my head above the parapet !  Bribery usually
> works better, but any sort of attention makes a pleasant change !!
> 
> I will be in San Diego, but as you can see from my job title below, I'm not
> a free agent.  Despite the fact that we all attend the IETF as individuals,
> my company has this WIERD idea that I should keep tabs on all the guys that
> I am paying to attend. And there are some meetings that I have to cover
> myself.
> 
> If there is no clash with another of my scheduled sessions, I will attend
> the WIERD meeting, if there is one.  However, I can't commit to anything
> else at present.  I might have a better idea of exactly what I'm doing
> (that'll make a change), when the IETF agenda is published.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Graham Travers
> 
> IP Standards Co-ordinator aexaCT
> *  Tel: +44 1359 235086
> *  Mobile:  0780 8502536
> > *    Fax:  +44 1359 235087
> *  HW B279, P.O. Box 200, London, N18 1ZF
> * - Email:  [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	April Marine [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent:	Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:48 PM
> > To:	[email protected]
> > Cc:	[email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject:	Re: WIERD
> > 
> > Graham,
> > 
> > Are you planning to be in San Diego?  Would you be willing to co-chair the
> > WG for that mtg, at which we should finalize the answers to the very good
> > questions you raise and decide whether to fold or go forward?  You seem to
> > have a good grasp of what needs to be done and would be a good colleague
> > with Chris, who knows the history.  This wouldn't be a long-term
> > commitment, but I'm wondering if you can help at this particular impasse?
> > 
> > (Just as an aside, do you normally react better to whining or bribery as
> > incentive to say yes to a request? :v)
> > 
> > thanks!
> > April
> > 
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 [email protected] wrote:
> > 
> > > Guys,
> > > 
> > > I didn't attend the Adelaide meeting, and there was no WEIRD meeting in
> > > Pittsburgh, so I've lost sight of where we are.
> > > 
> > > Before deciding to wrap up the WG, I'd like to see a review of what
> > progress
> > > has been made against the list of objectives that we brainstormed for
> > the
> > > WG.  If they are all achieved, then termination may be the right option
> > (
> > > although I tend to agree with comments that education is a continuing
> > > process ); if not, shouldn't we address what remains to be done ?
> > > 
> > > I would prefer such a review to take place on this list, as I find the
> > USWG
> > > meetings usually clash with something else that I have to cover ( hence
> > my
> > > ususal no-show ).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Graham Travers
> > > 
> > > IP Standards Co-ordinator aexaCT
> > > *  Tel: +44 1359 235086
> > > *  Mobile:  0780 8502536
> > > > *    Fax:  +44 1359 235087
> > > *  HW B279, P.O. Box 200, London, N18 1ZF
> > > * - Email:  [email protected]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From:	April Marine [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent:	Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:50 PM
> > > > To:	WEIRD WG
> > > > Subject:	San Diego
> > > > 
> > > > So, what do y'all think about meeting in San Diego?
> > > > 
> > > > At the last IETF, I asked for some feedback from USWG re whether they
> > > > thought WEIRD should declare its experiment done and close down, or
> > keep
> > > > going.  The consensus was that many thought WEIRD should keep going.
> > Of
> > > > course, WEIRD didn't meet last time, so it's not like actually asking
> > the
> > > > WG itself, so I thought I would ask you yourself.
> > > > 
> > > > One thing that Chris and I have talked about is getting a co-chair.
> > Is it
> > > > worth conning, uh, drafting someone to assist our WEIRD leader
> > (couldn't
> > > > resist that one :-), or do you all feel the WG is a loss?  
> > > > 
> > > > Should we schedule a mtg in San Diego to regroup? 
> > > > 
> > > > Should we put "WEIRD status" on the USWG agenda?
> > > > 
> > > > Anything we should consider that I haven't?
> > > > 
> > > > Feedback welcome and requested!
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > April
> > > > 
> > > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ----
> > > > April Marine				
> > > > Director of Client Services
> > [email protected]
> > > > Nominum, Inc.					+1.650.779.6006
> > > 
>