DRAFT IETF 45 WEIRD Minutes
Burke Chris-CCB007 <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jul 1999 16:24:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.weird |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Thanks to Ray Plzak for taking the minutes for the WEIRD working group. > Here's a draft of what I plan to submit for the proceedings. > > Please request any changes to the minutes by next Wednesday. > > Thanks for participating! It was great to see so many familiar faces in > Oslo. > > Chris Burke > > -----Original Message----- > Minutes from Weird WG Meeting - 14 July 1999 > Reported by Ray Plzak > > > 1. The working group charter was presented and explained. > > > > 2. The scope of activity was explained. The scope is limited to > > factual information relating to IETF WGs and BOFs. Specultive > > information will not be posted. > > > > 3. The name of the WEIRD group's web site was dicussed. > > Characteristics of the site name are dependent on target audience, > > reachability from IETF home page, and discoverability from a search > > engine. The web site name will be a third level domain of the > > IETF.ORG domain. The name will be something like "info" or "digest" > > or some similar name that will convey the idea of a repository of > > information. > > > > 4. Page design was discussed. The page will be an IETF content page > not a WG page. The design template submitted by Darin Jones > > (http://www.ravenrock.net/usv/weird.html was deemed to be a suitable > > functional layout. Line length will not be more than 60 characters > > because of human factors. A site map needs to be developed. Initial > > design team volunteers are April Marine and Bob Quinn. Darin Jones > > will be asked to participate. Others may volunteer from the list. > The size of the design team will be limited to no more than 5 or 6. > > > 5. Content was discussed. The target audience is people who are > > either new to the IETF or are internet generalists. The scope of the > > content is: > > > > * Current WG and BOF activities. > > * Specific Dependencies and interrelationships between a WG and BOF. > > * BOF history > > * Things hard to find on the IETF pages > > * Things not found on the IETF pages > > > > Hits on various items will be tracked to aid in determining the > > usefullness of the item. > > > The web page will be put up with a statement that this is work in > > progress and is initially put up to get information out to the internet > > community but will be improved over time. Ideas for improvement > > will be solicited in this statement. > > > > Items will be identified as either no/low maintenance and required > > maintenance. The no/low maintenance items will consist primarily > > links to other pages. Maintenance required items will require the > > participation of the Secretariat. > > > A list of specific content to work on first was discussed. Three items > > were selected for immediate action. Those three are: > > > > * Quick and Dirty Links. These are links that can be identified > > and established quickly. Examples are link to RFC editor queque and the > > IETF RFC search engine. A list of links will be solicited from the WG > > mail list. > > * Area Director's Overview. April will prepare a sample using > > the User Services Area. She will post this to the list for comment. > > Based upon comment a template will be developed which she will present > to > > the other ADs for their input. > > * Hot Topics. This item will be developed from the hot topics > > provided by the ADs and from the list. Topics from the discussion are > > IPv6, IPtelephony, QoS, Security, and Multicast. Ginny Listman will > > monitor the list for Hot Topics. > > > > Other things to do but for which no implementation schedule was > > established are: > > > > * FAQ links. A list of questions to assist the visitor in finding > > content. There will be a short answer with a link to the source for a > > more detailed answer. > > * Family tree of documents showing the IDs and RFCs related to > > specific topic or protocol. > > * RFC Supplement Section. A collection of documentary items that > > cannot be included in an RFC because of RFC format requirements - > > primarily this refers to graphic depictions of concepts, processes, and > > topologies that are described in the text of an RFC. The RFC editor > must > > become involved in this process. > > * BOFs > > * Other sources (IAB, Plenary session, etc) > > * Meta contents archive > > * Feed Back (feed back form from visitors on what they couldn't > > find. > > * IETF Rock - A graphical depiction of how an idea proceeds > > through the ID stage through the RFC stage - how STDs become STDs etc. > >