RE: Scheduling for London

ahhh.  yes.  Thanks, Scott.

NOW I remember why things got bogged down:

         The problem is with needing to distinguish mechanism from policy.

The constrained IETF efforts needs to specify mechanism only.  If possible, 
it should "require" no specific data in a response.  Any that it DOES 
require should be very minimal and utterly essential to operational 
requirements.

The real policy work, for deciding what to put in a response, can be 
debated elsewhere.

d/


At 01:58 PM 6/20/2001, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:47 PM
> > To: Dave Crocker; Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Scheduling for London
>
>
> > But, as Dave says, this is not a walk in the park. Significant work is
> > needed before a meeting will be fruitful.
>
>How relevant do folks see the work previously agreed to within ICANN circles
>to prescribe the info that must be returned in response to a domain name
>query?  Good building block, or still too muddled to form the basis of
>something to work from?
>
><Scott/>

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:[email protected]>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464