Re: Merging RRP and Whois

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.whois
Message-ID <[email protected]>
George,

Wearing my rrp-implementor hat, I'm implementing bulk transport of user
profiles[1], including a mechanism to support registry, registrar, and
also promoted registrant "hints" for policed access mechanisms. I've got
all the reliable, non-repudiation, secure hurdles to clear as well. Bulk
is zero-or-more user profiles, aka "registrar-provided registrant data".

One "hint" I think is required is the controlling jurisdiction(s) for
any specific datum, registrant originated, registrar originated, or
registry originated.

My idea of "extensible" is that the rrp _might_ be useful to the ccTLD
actors, or any other form of Registry-Registrar model ICANN posits in
the near future, as my rrp-implementor hat reads "gTLD(s) first".

Wearing my who-wannabe-implementor hat, I'm implementing non-bulk-query
of user profiles, and transporting data with hints intact for use at
some unspecified point where policy (or hints) are evaluated, isn't part
of the less-than-pelucid-spec. In fact, what spec? For all I know, the
lookup could point to registries having little or nothing to do with
DNS registry data, e.g., Acxiom.

Finding a schema, or bits of several, that can be recycled, isn't very
hard, but is it interesting? I don't think the rest of the problem is as
amenable to reuse or recycling or a unifying software architectural
model as the schema question.

Cheers,
Eric
---

[1] see also www.cpexchange.org, which has a bulk user profile exchange
protocol with similar properties, created by the on-line marketers and
ultra-large vertically integrated vendors.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.