Re: Merging RRP and Whois
"James Seng/Personal" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.whois |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <090501c08620$ea140570$06272dd4@jamessonyvaio> |
I am just stating generic privacy concern. I dont have any strong motivation in either way. I also understand there are various legistration and policy wrt to this sort of stuff and it is probably too simple to say to-do-or-not-to-do. I suppose it will various from different implementation and deployment and under what justistration. But I think this is one of the example whereby it is probably bad idea for engineers to decide. What we need to come up with is a protocol which can handle either with audit trail or without. -James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:38 PM Subject: Re: Merging RRP and Whois > > ... I wouldnt want to leave an audit trail of WHOIS. > > James, > > Could you please clarify this? > > Are you expressing: > > a query-originator's preference? > a query-router's preference? > a query-responder's preference? > a queried-datum's preference? > some other entitie's preference? > > Could you motivate/explain the prefernce(s)? > > Sent only to ietf-whois, despite the subject line and thread. > > TiA, > Eric