RE: Merging RRP and Whois

"Paul George" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.whois
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fair enough, thanks for the info Randy.  But I think my question is still
valid.  Does "whois" have a valid place in a generic regsitry/registrar
protocol?  Will ALL registration systems need "whois" functionality?  Okay,
if they don't need it, then they don't have to implement that part, but that
could be said for a million other little bits of functionality.....  Even
though I think of any right now, I'm sure someone else can. :-)

The fundemental question is :

Is 'whois' an integral part of a protocol that is intended to provide a
means for the registration of objects?

IMHO, I think it is not.  And I hope we can move forward on this soon.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Paul George
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Merging RRP and Whois


> Isn't whois simply a means of looking up Internet domain name
> information?

no it is not.  while the domain indu$try uses he protocol, many others do
too.  and they have just as legitimate claims to its functionality as the
domain exploition indu$try.

randy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.