Re: Merging RRP and Whois

Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.whois
Message-ID <p05100858b694cded21a1@[193.0.4.72]>
At 12.37 -0500 01-01-24, George Belotsky wrote:
>It would not take too much effort to simply use the Whois-like
>features (perhaps with a little extension) of the RRP to provide Whois
>services to end users.

I think this is a VERY interesting path that you should consider 
seriously! Including anonymous access, and ability for registrants 
(yes, registrants) to because of data protection laws update whatever 
is necessary in the registry database in the case of a thick 
registry.  Also, this connection might be needed also for DNSSEC key 
signing issues...

I.e. if you do a protocol, and need overlapping functions, see if you 
should not do _one_...

What goes on port 43 is a completely different story, and it should 
stay that way.

   paf -- with my AD hat on as you can see in the signature


-- 
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]>       Internet Engineering Task Force
Area Director, Applications Area                   http://www.ietf.org
Phone: (Stockholm) +46-8-4494212            (San Jose) +1-408-525-0940
        PGP: 2DFC AAF6 16F0 F276 7843  2DC1 BC79 51D9 7D25 B8DC
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.