Re: Re: Merging RRP and Whois

On 26.01.01 00:22 [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> > And IMHO, there is no technical reason to forbid a registrant to 
access
> > the registry directly, should certain policy or technical reqirement
> > needs it. I am not saying the registry SHOULD (or MUST) do this, but
> > that they MAY.
> 
> Agree. Why can't we simplify the requirement, ie. the
> system (protocol/implementation) should only allow
> *one* entity to access (read/write/update) to a record?
> This *one* entity could be registrar, reseller, registrant,
> registry, whatever. As long it is *one* entity.
> (That way it can accomodate any business model.)
> 

Not any. There are still exceptions which sometimes happen. Even if we 
usually allow only changes by the registrar we have the cases were due to 
court decisions, emergent claims from registrants we are enforced to make 
changes. And therefore it is better if there is a possibility for the 
registry to define a hierarchie of authorisation. This hierarchie can 
contain only one entity but can fit also the needs which at least some 
ccTLDs have,

Regards Sabine

> 
> -- budi
> --
> Homepage: <http://budi.insan.co.id>
> my presentation materials, papers, scrapbook, ... and more
> What's your "web.id"? Register your web.id @ http://www.idnic.net.id
> 
Sabine  Dolderer 
DENIC eG
Wiesenhüttenplatz 26
D-60329 Frankfurt

eMail: [email protected]
Fon: +49 69 27235 0
Fax: +49 69 27235 235