Re: Merging RRP and Whois
Shane Kerr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.whois |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Christopher Ambler wrote: > > Now, having lambasted the idea of lumping whois into provreg, I've a goofy > > idea. Can PROVREG recommend a scalable solution to the consideration of > > NIC-HANDLES? To my knowledge, this has never been addressed properly, at > > least since the days when the IR was split. When we did the RA project, the > > thought was to tag the NIC-HANDLE with the registrars "stamp", e.g. > > I'm sure this has come up in the past, but why not email addresses? > They're unique, and identify the source. Master information on the > handle is kept by whatever registry handles the TLD in question. I can see that sending to both ietf-provreg and ietf-whois is going to cause some problems. :( NIC handles are used by people who have nothing to do with domains. I'd prefer something that ties the NIC-HDL with the database storing information, which will not be the database storing the domain on the e-mail address of the contact, except in domain databases. Otherwise either I must form some sort of relationship with a domain database operator, or I just can't use them. Shane ~