Re: Merging RRP and Whois

Sheer El-Showk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.whois
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Now, having lambasted the idea of lumping whois into provreg, I've a goofy
> idea.  Can PROVREG recommend a scalable solution to the consideration of
> NIC-HANDLES? To my knowledge, this has never been addressed properly, at 
> least since the days when the IR was split. When we did the RA project, the
> thought was to tag the NIC-HANDLE with the registrars "stamp", e.g.
> 
> 	WM110-NSI
> 	WM110-RIPE
> 	WM110-ARIN
> 
> but this leads, as friend Bush commented at the RIPE-37 mtg, to inconsistancies
> between registration agents. IN a nutshell, do we need globally unique IDs 
> to the registering agents?  If so, who administers that ID space?

Why would we want global NIC handles?  Transfers?  Data-consistency?  Making 
life easier for the registrant?

None of these seem sufficiently important to merit the kind of effort
(either bureacratic -- if its one big NIC Handle registry; or technical --
if the registries used a shared/synced NIC Handle DB).  Especially because
registries may not want to share their NIC handles for various privacy or
reasons.

That having been said, what I like about an idea like this is it would
make it simpler to determine who is authoritative owner of a domain - an
issue I think we should really consider since it seems to be done mostly
by "out-of-band" methods (email's sent by the registry -- at least
Verisign -- to determine the domain owner) -- which I agree should 
be eliminated.  Still I think a focus on digitally certifying a domain is
the right way to go, rather than centralizing user information.

Sheer
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.