Redundant signature algorithm info in certs.

"Erik Andersen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The question about apparently redundant signature algorithm information in
public-key certificates, attribute certificates and CRLs has been raised
before. It seems clear that by including the signature algorithm within the
body of the cert, it is protected by the signature. But why does the
algorithm then has to be part of the signature itself?

 

I am not suggesting to change current specifications. The question could be
relevant for new  signed structures developed by other specifications.

 

Erik

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.