Re: Should a CRL be required for an OCSP service provider to assert status.
Stephen Kent <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin, > ... > The really interesting change was the change in the definition of > "revoked", where an updated OCSP responder can report "revoked" > in situations where the previous spec sort-of implied "good". To which text, specifically, are you referring? Steve _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix