Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4211 (4797)

Lijun,

We have edited this report to contain your correction in the Notes field as requested.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Sep 8, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Lijun Liao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just correction:
> 
> The Notes should be as follows:
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> The original text conflicts with the following text block (just several lines later).
> 
> "     The fields of POPOSigningKey have the following meaning:
>       ...
>  
>       signature contains the POP value produce.  If poposkInput is
>       present, the signature is computed over the DER-encoded value of
>       poposkInput.  If poposkInput is absent, the signature is computed
>       over the DER-encoded value of certReq."
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:00 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4211,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4211&eid=4797
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Lijun Liao <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 4.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    3.  The certificate subject places its name in the Certificate
>        Template structure along with the public key.  In this case the
>        poposkInput field is omitted from the POPOSigningKey structure.
>        The signature field is computed over the DER-encoded certificate
>        template structure.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    3.  The certificate subject places its name in the Certificate
>        Template structure along with the public key.  In this case the
>        poposkInput field is omitted from the POPOSigningKey structure.
>        The signature field is computed over the DER-encoded value of
>        certReq
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The original text conflicts with the following text block (just several lines later).
> 
> "   The fields of POPOSigningKeyInput have the following meaning:
> 
>       sender contains an authenticated identity that has been previously
>       established for the subject.
> 
>       publicKeyMAC contains a computed value that uses a shared secret
>       between the CA/RA and the certificate requestor.
> 
>       publicKey contains a copy of the public key from the certificate
>       template.  This MUST be exactly the same value as is contained in
>       the certificate template."
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4211 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)
> Publication Date    : September 2005
> Author(s)           : J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lijun Liao

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix