Re: CMP/EST versus FIDO Alliance

Anders Rundgren <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 2017-05-25 09:51, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> In FIDO alliance products key container attestations is a mandatory feature, while in PKIX related enrollment standards it is still a largely unknown concept:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg33122.html
>
> Anders

I forgot to mention that deployment of a "second factor" is also a mandatory part of FIDO alliance products, while entirely absent in PKIX counterparts:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg28990.html

Now the browser vendors have removed support for enrollment of client-side PKI which is quite logical given the inferior state of this technology.

Anders

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.