Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091)
"Phillip" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Please reject, Errata 5065 already updates this section, we should avoid errata of errata. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6844&rec_status=15&presenta tion=records The second space does not worry me nearly as much as the issues to do with CNAME handling. -----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:15 AM To: Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]>; Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>; Rob Stradling <[email protected]>; IETF PKIX <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5091) I do not think the extra space will confuse any implementers. Also, since the LAMPS WG is considering a charter item to update this document, a resolution of "held for future update" seems right to me. Russ > On Aug 18, 2017, at 11:06 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6844, "DNS > Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5091 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Mak Kolybabi <[email protected]> > > Section: 4 > > Original Text > ------------- > o If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise > > Corrected Text > -------------- > o If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA(X), otherwise > > Notes > ----- > Remove unnecessary space after second CAA, making appearances of CAA(X) consistent throughout the section. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. > When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change > the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6844 (draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record > Publication Date : January 2013 > Author(s) : P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > pkix mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix