Re: New Version Notification for draft-belyavskiy-certificate-limitation-policy-04.txt
Peter Bowen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.x509,gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.security.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK6vND90Fryurf4QZYnjaw8iMmhn7=pE4YgW+5R2i5ertMGWsg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:59 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky via dev-security-policy <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is the new version of the draft updated according to the discussion on > mozilla-dev-security list. Given that RFC 5914 already defines a TrustAnchorList and TrustAnchorInfo object and that the Trust Anchor List object is explicitly contemplated as being included in a signed CMS message, would it not make more sense to start from 5914 and define new extensions encode constraints not currently defined? Thanks, Peter