Re: Question about Curve P-192
Ernst G Giessmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 2018-05-11 um 12:09 schrieb Denis: > Michael, > > I don't see how RFC 5480 can be used to obtain an *identifier* for a > cryptographic *suite* for both P-192 and > a SHA-256 hash function truncated to 192 bits. > > In between, I got a response why the leftmost bits shall be used. > > Close to the end of section 6.4NIST FIPS 186-4 > <http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.186-4.pdf> states: > > When the length of the output of the hash function is greater than > the bit length of /n/, then the *leftmost **/n/**bits* of the hash > function > output block *shall be used* in any calculation using the hash > function output during the generation or verification of a digital > signature. > > A hash function that provides a lower security strength than the > security strength associated with the bit length of n ordinarily > *should not* > be used, since this would reduce the security strength of the > digital signature process to a level no greater than that provided > by the hash function. > Yes, and therefore you can use any hash function (in the sense of ISO), because the output of a hash function is **always** a bit string. /Ernst. _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix