Re: [Cfrg] Applied Quantum Resistant Crypto

CJ Tjhai <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.saag,gmane.ietf.x509,gmane.ietf.irtf.cfrg
Message-ID <CANs=h-V=bx8V_SRFePZHUG=hd-giRb6vtyN6n2NivJB_QqdgVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Max,

There is also an experimental work on hybrid post-quantum key-exchange for
IKEv2 VPN. The work was done on a forked of strongSwan and it is available
here: https://github.com/post-quantum/strongswan/commits/qske and it works
on Linux, Android and OS X. It relies on the post-quantum libraries that is
available at this repository: https://github.com/post-quantum/nistpqc,
which contains a number of post-quantum algorithms submitted as part of
NIST standardization. Not all submitted algorithms are included, but it's
pretty straightforward to add additional ones.

This experimental work implements version 00 of this IETF draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tjhai-ipsecme-hybrid-qske-ikev2/. We
hope to update the experimental work once the draft is in a more mature
state.

Best regards,
CJ



On 17 July 2018 at 20:35, Dr. Pala <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there are people interested in setting up some sort of
> discussion forum where to discuss the deployment (from a practical point of
> view) for QRC in their systems. The intent here would be to share the
> experiences, provide feedback, and possibly even share
> implementations/references/etc.
>
> Moreover, being this quite a new field when it comes to real-world
> applications, it would be interesting to understand the new requirements so
> that we can plan for algorithm agility correctly and not having to go
> through what we suffered in the past (and in some cases with current
> protocols) to upgrade/switch among different schemes/algorithms.
>
> For example, some of the topics might include:
>
>    - How to deploy PKI services
>    - Mixed environments considerations (QRC and "Traditional" Crypto)
>    - Mixed environments (stateful vs. stateless)
>    - Encryption and Key-Exchange for QRC - what are the options there (it
>    seems auth is well understood, but other problems are still open)?
>    - Are there implications for the deployment of PKIs we need to be
>    aware of and are not currently mentioned/addressed?
>    - Any real-world deployment out there (or plans for it)?
>    - Algorithm Agility, what to plan for?
>    - Applicability to Revocation Services
>
> Most of the activities to standardize QRC in CMS/SecFirmware/etc. that I
> can see are related to the use of Stateful HASHSIG and I have not seen any
> "standardization" activities around stateless schemes (e.g., SPHINCS), but
> if I am wrong, please let me know (and if you could provide some
> interesting links, that would be great). I think it would be useful to
> understand how to practically deploy these new schemes and how to refine /
> provide the building blocks required for their implementation and
> deployment.
>
> Here's some references:
>
> Merkle Tree Signatures (Stateful):
>
>    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs/
>    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-cms-mts-hash-sig/
>    - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-housley-suit-cose-hash-sig-04.txt
>    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8391/ (XMSS)
>    - https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/063 (Viability of Post Quantum X.509
>    Certs Paper)
>
>    - Implementations:
>       - https://github.com/cisco/hash-sigs
>
> SPHINCS Related (Stateless):
>
>    - https://sphincs.org/
>
>    - Implementations:
>    - https://sphincs.org/data/sphincs+-reference-
>       implementation-20180313.tar.bz2
>       <https://sphincs.org/data/sphincs+-reference-implementation-20180313.tar.bz2>
>
> Other Relevant Links:
>
>    - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-truskovsky-lamps-pq-
>    hybrid-x509/
>    - https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/Post-Quantum-Cryptography
>    - http://test-pqpki.com/
>
> I guess this is all for now - you can reply privately at the following
> addresses:
>
>     [email protected]
>     [email protected]
>
> Thanks,
> Max
> --
> Best Regards,
> Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
> OpenCA Labs Director
> [image: OpenCA Logo]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
>
pmcbhebgdaofbblo.png (image/png, 3.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.