Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6844 (5452)
Alice Russo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Verifiers, Just FYI, the submitter name and email address have been corrected on this report: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5452 (These changes were confirmed with the submitter. Details in-line below.) Thank you. RFC Editor/ar On Aug 6, 2018, at 11:13 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6844, > "DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5452 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical OLD: Reported by: EBNF, text, examples do not match <[email protected]> NEW: Reported by: Rich Salz <[email protected]> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > > The EBNF (scattered throughout the document) does not match the examples > nor the prose. It is also ambiguous in places (allowing two different > interpretations of a parameter list), and nonsensical in others (such > as the handling of whitespace). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The EBNF should be corrected as follows: > > issuevalue = *WSP [domain *WSP] [";" *WSP [parameters *WSP]] > > domain = label *("." label) > label = (ALPHA / DIGIT) *( *("-") (ALPHA / DIGIT)) > > parameters = (parameter *WSP ";" *WSP parameters) / parameter > parameter = tag *WSP "=" *WSP value > tag = (ALPHA / DIGIT) *(ALPHA / DIGIT) > value = *(%x21-3A / %x3C-7E) > > > Notes > ----- > I am proposing this on behalf of the IETF ACME WG. We want to submit a standards-track document, but the current CAA specification is broken. We know it is being revised, but we do not want to wait. Our AD has said to submit the errata and he will accept it. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6844 (draft-ietf-pkix-caa-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record > Publication Date : January 2013 > Author(s) : P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix