Re: Validating Certs w/out reliable source of Time

Rob Stradling <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Max.  The most promising solution I've seen to this problem is 
Google's Roughtime protocol.

Adam Langley's blog post:
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/09/19/roughtime.html

Protocol description:
https://roughtime.googlesource.com/roughtime/+/HEAD/PROTOCOL.md

Open-source implementation:
https://roughtime.googlesource.com/roughtime

Cloudflare's Roughtime service:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/roughtime/

On 04/10/18 15:21, Dr. Pala wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am struggling with one issue that we have been seeing more and more 
> often with the introduction of small IoT devices that connect to clouds 
> and need to validate the other party's certificate chain.
> 
> In particular, the problem is that without a reliable (or trusted) 
> source of Time information, devices can not really validate certificates 
> (i.e., is the certificate even valid... ? is it expired ? is the 
> revocation info fresh enough ?) and my question for the list is about 
> best practices in the space.
> 
> Do you know if there are indications / best practices from ITU or from 
> IETF (or other organizations) on how to deal with this issue ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Max
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
> OpenCA Labs Director
> OpenCA Logo

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
Email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.