Re: IPR Disclosure CERTICOM CORP's Statement about IPR related to RFC 3279 and RFC 3280

The patent should be the attached one and it mentions RFC 3279 and RFC 3280 as "cited by examiner".
Does this mean that "the patent(s) or patent application(s) disclosed above that would necessarily be infringed by implementation of the technology required by the relevant IETF specification" that are already were published when the patent was examined, in fact also mentioned in the patent itself?

I'm not a lawyer but this makes no sense to me.

Andrea

@Peter: sorry if you received twice the message, I used a wrong account to send the previous one


> Il giorno 4 ott 2019, alle ore 01:10, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
> IETF Secretariat <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "Algorithms and
>> Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and
>> Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile" (RFC3279) was submitted to the
>> IETF Secretariat on  and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual
>> Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3798/). The
>> title of the IPR disclosure is "CERTICOM CORP's Statement about IPR related
>> to RFC 3279 and RFC 3280"
> 
> Could someone, maybe an IP lawyer, have a look at this and try and figure out
> what, if anything, it has to do with 3280, and more importantly 2459 which
> predates the patent by a decade?
> 
> Peter.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix