Re: IPR Disclosure CERTICOM CORP's Statement about IPR related to RFC 3279 and RFC 3280
Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMm+LwgOK7Zjo6dvqo6pFQajJNwuK+8w7VzNSb-oKL9GDpc1TA@mail.gmail.com> |
I had noticed that, meant to mention it. My point in raising the prior art was to point out to Certicom that this is a rubbish patent in any case. Sirbu and co at CMU have the prior art (Netbill?) and it is not a scheme that has any relevance today. On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:31 AM Dan Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, > > This IPR disclosure was removed at the submitter's request. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3798/ > _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix