Re: Optimizing OCSP - Time for some spec work ?
"Todd E. Johnson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Oh, You mean the following? https://github.com/GSA/ficam-scvp-testing/tree/master/utilities/vss2 Otherwise, I tried to document other implementations at the time: https://github.com/grandamp/SCVPAPI/blob/master/README.md On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 22:20, Peter Gutmann<[email protected]> wrote: Todd E. Johnson <[email protected]> writes: >FWIW, RFC 5055 implementations are quite rare "Quite rare" is being generous :-). Some portion of the USG played with one years ago, I think they had some Java code done by a government contractor, and AFAIK that's it. I got the impression at the time that it was more a means of getting vendor lock-in than anything else, i.e. using a protocol that nothing else implemented ensured you got the contract because there was no alternative I'm not sure if Denis was being deliberately disingeneous with the 5055 reference... Peter. _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix