Re: Question about RFC 3125

I mean it has to be an OID - right?

spt

> On Nov 12, 2019, at 10:29, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Section 3.4 of RFC 3125 talks about Commitment Rules, and it specifies the following structure:
> 
>   CommitmentType ::= SEQUENCE {
>        identifier                      CommitmentTypeIdentifier,
>        fieldOfApplication      [0] FieldOfApplication OPTIONAL,
>        semantics               [1] DirectoryString OPTIONAL }
> 
> However, CommitmentTypeIdentifier is never defined.  Is it an object identifier?
> 
> Can anyone point to a public signature policy that uses the SignaturePolicy defined in RFC 3125?
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix