Re: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6402 (3943)

(I'm not sure how the sentence was supposed to finish, but) I guess when I
was looking at this I either didn't look for the full modules or thought
that they were not normative in the same sense as the body text.

That said, a single errata report that does the same thing in multiple
sections is a little annoying, and we might be better off cloning to get
the desired effect, especially now that we have "view errata in line"
functionality.

-Ben

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:59:51PM -0500, Sean Turner wrote:
> Jim,
> 
> Shouldn't this also apply to the modules in Appendices A.1 and A.2?  Maybe this was some issue with the 
> 
> spt
> 
> > On Dec 16, 2019, at 18:49, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > The following errata report has been held for document update 
> > for RFC6402, "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates". 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3943
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > Status: Held for Document Update
> > Type: Technical
> > 
> > Reported by: Jim Schaad <[email protected]>
> > Date Reported: 2014-04-02
> > Held by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)
> > 
> > Section: 2.8,
> > 
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >      ChangeSubjectName ::= SEQUENCE {
> >          subject             Name OPTIONAL,
> >          subjectAlt          SubjectAltName OPTIONAL
> >      }
> >      (WITH COMPONENTS {..., subject PRESENT} |
> >            COMPONENTS {..., subjectAlt PRESENT} )
> > 
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >      ChangeSubjectName ::= SEQUENCE {
> >          subject             Name OPTIONAL,
> >          subjectAlt          [1] SubjectAltName OPTIONAL
> >      }
> >      (WITH COMPONENTS {..., subject PRESENT} |
> >            COMPONENTS {..., subjectAlt PRESENT} )
> > 
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Both Name and SubjectAltName use the same tag (SEQUENCE) so it is not possible to distinguish between the two fields without having a tag on one of them.  This fix adds an (arbitrarily chosen) tag so that it is possible to differentiate the two fields.
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates
> > Publication Date    : November 2011
> > Author(s)           : J. Schaad
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> > Area                : Security
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkix mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
> 

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix