Re: OCSP reponses without nexUpdate
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Kopp <[email protected]> writes: >Does it mean for subsequent requests that one of the fields thisUpdate or >producedAt must change even if certificate status has not changed? Yes, no, and maybe. If you're applying strict CRL compatibility, you set it to the CRL nextUpdate time. If you decide that since it's an online service another update can become available at any time, you set it the current time. If you're running CRLs at the same time, you set it to the next CRL production time. If you're doing batch signing to deal with OCSP's non-scalability, in other words pre-producing responses, you set it to when the next batch of responses get signed. If you believe the Martians are coming, you set it to just before they land so there's no expectations of OCSP responses after they've killed us all. If you don't believe any of the above then feel free to come up with another interpretation and use that. See long-ago threads on this list for more suggestions on how this field can be interpreted (I can't remember all of the variants). Another interpretation is to do whatever makes sense to you and put it in your CPS. Peter.