Re: DER encoding in RFC 3161
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Manger, James <[email protected]> writes: >Such whole-of-cert fingerprints are very widely used, but a slight change of >context (from an allowlist to a blocklist) can make them unexpectedly >dangerous. Sure, but if you're using default-allow (= blocklist), which makes #1 in the "The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security", https://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/dumb/, then your security mechanism is broken from the start and you need to fix the mechanism you're using. (This was debated years ago on this very list: We can't use cert fingerprints because they're not bug-compatible with the default-allow brokenness of CRLs et al, which is one reason why after thirty-odd years we're still permanently stuck behind attackers who can move faster than our blocklists can catch up). Peter.