Re: DER encoding in RFC 3161

Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Manger, James <[email protected]> writes:

>Such whole-of-cert fingerprints are very widely used, but a slight change of
>context (from an allowlist to a blocklist) can make them unexpectedly
>dangerous.

Sure, but if you're using default-allow (= blocklist), which makes #1 in the
"The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security",
https://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/dumb/, then your
security mechanism is broken from the start and you need to fix the mechanism
you're using.

(This was debated years ago on this very list: We can't use cert fingerprints
because they're not bug-compatible with the default-allow brokenness of CRLs
et al, which is one reason why after thirty-odd years we're still permanently
stuck behind attackers who can move faster than our blocklists can catch up).

Peter.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.