Re: A question regarding certificate status service delegation

Peter,

I presented the slides at 2004 November PKIX WG at IETF held in Washington
DC.

Subsequently I wrote a paper and presented it at NIST PKI Research
Conference.

I am happy to send those two collaterals to you or you are welcome to locate
them if they are posted on some web sites.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Gutmann [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 4:35 PM
To: Santosh Chokhani <[email protected]>; 'Thomas Kopp'
<[email protected]>; 'pkix' <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pkix] A question regarding certificate status service
delegation

Santosh Chokhani <[email protected]> writes:

>Both indirect CRL and OCSP delegation suffer from a class of errors or 
>attacks without crypto binding.

For those members of the class who weren't present at the time, could you
explain the attacks?

Peter.