Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5280 (6414)

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:34:51AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> I propose that this erratum be rejected outright. It is clear that the 
> current text is unclear, particularly with the passage of time. The way 
> to correct that is with a new Internet Draft that updates 5280, with a 
> lot more words than just the limited space in the ASN.1 comment.

So, your stance is that the current text is unclear, which should be
remedied by a document update?  I'm not sure how that implies "rejected" as
opposed to "hold for document update"...

-Ben