Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6402 (6571)

This should be accepted. It’s right in A.2 (the 2008 syntax).

spt

> On May 4, 2021, at 17:22, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6402,
> "Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6571
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: Appendix A.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>         pendInfo               PendInfo,
>         extendedFailInfo       SEQUENCE {
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>         pendInfo               PendInfo,
>         extendedFailInfo       [1] SEQUENCE {
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The ASN.1 module will not compile properly without a tag on one of these elements.  The ASN.1 module in Appendix A.2 has a tag in this spot.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6402 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5272-bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) Updates
> Publication Date    : November 2011
> Author(s)           : J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix