Re: In-the-wild implementations of RFC6955?
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2022 06:22:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SY4PR01MB6251FD54A917409C51BBCBC2EED79@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> |
Michael StJohns <[email protected]> writes: >Is anyone aware of > >a) implementation of CSR software which can generate requests for ECDH >certificates [crickets] While it's difficult to prove a negative, ECDH certs are just a rerun of DH certificates from 20 years ago, which were supported by exactly nobody [0], so I would assume it's no different for ECDH certs. In addition even if you could somehow generate an (EC)DH cert I'd be even more surprised if you could find anything that knew what to do with it when it saw it. So just out of curiosity, to help understand the use case since I've never seen one before and it'd be interesting to hear about it, please lie on this couch and tell me why/how you're planning on using these things. And remember, this is for posterity, so be honest — how do ECDH certs make you feel? Peter. [0] Well, a few implementations went through the motions of half-hearted token support so they couldn't be accused of being non-standards-compliant, but not much more than that.